It's Nathan Fillion newest series and it's actually quite entertaining. Hulu.com has a number of episodes as does surfthechannel.com (Warning: for surfthechannel make sure you have very good virus protection)
I really enjoy Castle. It's one of the few shows with writing good enough to make me laugh out loud. And of course [cheats and gets name from previous post] Nathan Fillion is a great actor. I wouldn't call him a comic actor, and I can't exactly explain what makes him funny, maybe it's his delivery.
Oh! And he's a mystery writer who plays poker, so every now and then you see him discussing the current case with his poker buddies- who are real life mystery writers. I always love it when writers get to actually be in things they or other writers write. It's all so recursive. If you'll pardon the pun.
Nathan's acting is hardly subtle, but he has fantastic delivery and a very natural style. Hmm. Wonder if I could persuade him to play Monty in the TV series...
no subject
Date: 2009-11-28 11:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-28 11:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-29 12:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-29 12:01 am (UTC)Surfthechannel.com should be accessible.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-29 05:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-28 11:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-29 04:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-29 05:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-29 06:31 am (UTC)Oh! And he's a mystery writer who plays poker, so every now and then you see him discussing the current case with his poker buddies- who are real life mystery writers. I always love it when writers get to actually be in things they or other writers write. It's all so recursive.
If you'll pardon the pun.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-29 10:51 am (UTC)Nathan's acting is hardly subtle, but he has fantastic delivery and a very natural style. Hmm. Wonder if I could persuade him to play Monty in the TV series...
no subject
Date: 2009-11-29 11:49 am (UTC)http://www.sidereel.com/Castle?source=mytvschedule
no subject
Date: 2009-11-29 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-29 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-29 02:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-29 12:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-29 02:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-29 02:51 pm (UTC)Of course, I could be mistaken :D